wrestling / News

Jim Ross Claims No One Was Booing Roman Reigns Before The Royal Rumble

January 30, 2015 | Posted by Joseph Lee

Jim Ross has updated the blog section of his official website in which he provides his thoughts on last night’s Smackdown and the Royal Rumble backlash. Here are highlights:

On some more random Royal Rumble thoughts: : “No one was booing Roman Reigns at live events prior to the Rumble. People booed Reigns because Daniel Bryan did NOT win the Rumble match and not because Roman DID. In hindsight, like Orton, and Sheamus, Daniel Bryan should not have been booked in the Rumble match. I still feel that the next several WWE TV broadcasts will hold new and provocative content as it relates to the Rumble matters leading into WM31. Fans often times forget that there are multiple, ‘right’ ways to do something regarding storylines, etc in the biz. It’s been that way since I can remember.”

On the casket match at SmackDown: “Daniel Bryan got a key victory over Kane on Thursday night Smackdown but I still am leery that most fans won’t like who DB faces at WM31 unless it’s in a title bout or should I say it’s in THE title bout.”

On Roman Reigns and Triple H’s announcement on next week’s RAW: “While many still question WWE’s decision to postilion Roman Reigns where he’s headed apparently, I applaud the long term planning component of the process. I do agree with many that Reigns is a work in progress but he’s got a great upside IMO. I love this, any time a villain says he’s going to put an end to a particular controversy, it generally means he’s going to add to said controversy.”

article topics :

Jim Ross, Joseph Lee